Know your rights!

The first thing you need to know is that in Australia, vaccination is not compulsory. It doesn’t matter what your doctor, school principal, mother in law or neighbour say – no school is legally allowed to discriminate against a child because of their vaccination status, and if they do try, you can make a human rights complaint against them.

Unfortunately with the No Jab No Pay laws coming in to force on the 1st January 2016 the government can now withhold Child Care Rebate and all Child Care Benefits (including Grandparent Child Care Benefit, Special Child Care Benefit or Jobs, Education and Training Child Care Fee Assistance), the only affected family tax benefit is the Family Tax Benefit A end-of-year annual supplement (presently $726 per child). The other FTB Part A and Part B benefits are NOT affected.

You can still get a medical exemption but this has also been tightened to only accept anaphylactic reactions to individual vaccines or vaccine components, natural immunity, and temporary exemptions are also given to immunocompromised children. A 2017 Administrative Appeals Tribunal has upheld the right of an appropriately qualified doctor or specialist to certify in writing without using the extremely restrictive Human Services medical exemption form, which enabled a child to get their payments reinstalled see here

All Medicare and Centrelink offices as well as every GP and council vaccination clinic are required to have this form available, but they rarely do so feel free to click the link above and download and print the form yourself so you can bring it with you when you go to get it signed.

The significance of conscientious objection to vaccination and what it’s loss means to us all…

In the late 1990’s, the Australian government was considering making parents prove their knowledge of the vaccination debate prior to allowing them to not vaccinate their children. This was early days for the AVN, but we found out about this legislation after it had already passed through the House of Representatives and just days before the debate started in the Senate. We mobilised parents from the Gold Coast and Northern NSW, raised $2,000 for airfares and the help of a lobbyist and photocopied an information pack for every single Senator which we hand-delivered during our time in Canberra.

We met with dozens of Senators and Representatives and were helped greatly by Democrats Senators, the Greens party and several Labor MPs including 2 who were also doctors!

The outcome was that we were able to get 2 out of 3 amendments to the Childcare Payments Bill passed through parliament and as a result, parents who had chosen not to vaccinate would not be required to prove anything to anyone in order to access the same government entitlements as those parents who vaccinated fully.

This was a huge step forward for parental rights and as a result of the action of our small, membership and donation-driven organisation, a generation of Australians have been protected against draconian laws which would have subjected them to discrimination and financial penalties.

So when you feel that only large groups and rich people can change society for the better, remember the saying by Margaret Mead:

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”


Who would have thought that we would be called on to fight the same battle yet again in 2015?

A small group of committed individuals answered the call, including the AVN President Tasha David. We went to Canberra several times during 2015 and successfully lobbied the Senators to give us a Senate inquiry in to the No Jab No Pay bill.

Unfortunately, with the passing of the No Jab No Pay law in November 2015 all of our hard work was undone and the government showed it’s contempt for the 99% of the 3000 submissions sent in to the Senate inquiry speaking against the bill, including our expert witness Dr Lucija Tomljenovic and submissions by Dr Tetyana Obukhanych PhD and Dr Suzanne Humphries.

They took away our conscientious objection exemption including the religious exemption and have given themselves the power to withhold childcare payments and the family tax benefit A supplement payment from families who do not fully vaccinate

The government has made it that only the rich have a true choice when it comes to vaccination in Australia, even though they are the ones who have the lowest vaccination rates. But then this was about making a political point at the expense of loving and well informed low income parents in Australia, not about improving the health of our children.

But if you thought that this is over you could not be more wrong, that is the thing with committed individuals they never give up.  Please help us to help you and fight coercive and discriminatory vaccination laws in Australia, join the AVN or volunteer your skills, time and energy to help us become a social force who has the power to make change happen!

184 comments on “Know your rights!
  1. Melissa Partridge says:

    I support you. I’ve just been penalised by $1600 because I do not immunise my 2 children. Surely there are human rights breaches in these government acts.

  2. Soraya says:

    The State is a branch of the government corporation network hence bound by the law of contracts.

    Why all this bullying against Conscientious Objectors and nefarious laws excluding their children as they are a minority after all? Well, not just to seclude them in order to vaccinating parents not realize how healthier their children would be without injections but also to push them into accepting the catch up programs so they lose their objector status. This way, turning them more vulnerable to future restrictive unlawful laws!

    Parents are NOT LAWFULLY OBLIGATED TO GET THEIR CHILDREN VACCINATED, they can (and should) keep their Exemption Conscientious Objection Forms. They were officially given by the government and that’s an acquired right. If it doesn’t accept it anymore that’s another issue. But it’s your right officially recognized at the time.

    Moreover, parents can add to it a written letter with all the reasons why they DO NOT CONSENT (all they want is consensus…. totalitarian corporatocracy), this way don’t give in!!! Then get it to a notary public (international justice of peace official) so you can take it overseas too. Interesting report on this regard at

  3. Soraya says:

    From the 2016-2017 “Statement 8: Statement of Risks (continued)
    Contingent liabilities — unquantifiable” at:

    “Medical Indemnity Exceptional Claims Scheme

    In May 2003, the Australian Government announced that the Medical Indemnity Exceptional Claims Scheme was to assume liability for 100 per cent of any damages payable against a doctor that exceeds a specified level of cover provided by that doctor’s medical indemnity insurer (currently $20 million). These arrangements would apply to payouts either related to a single large claim or to multiple claims that in aggregate exceed the cover provided by the doctor’s medical indemnity insurer, and would apply to claims notified under contracts based cover since 1 January 2003.”

  4. Soraya says:

    From the 2016-2017 “Statement 8: Statement of Risks (continued)
    Contingent liabilities — unquantifiable” at:

    “Indemnities relating to vaccines

    The Australian Government has provided an indemnity to the manufacturer of smallpox vaccine held by the Australian Government, covering possible adverse events that could result from the use of the vaccine in an emergency situation. Further, under certain conditions, certain indemnities have been provided to particular manufacturers of pandemic and pre pandemic influenza vaccines for the supply or future supply of influenza vaccines (including H1N1 and H5N1).”

  5. Soraya says:

    From the 2016-2017 “Statement 8: Statement of Risks (continued)
    Contingent liabilities — unquantifiable” at

    “Indemnities relating to vaccines

    The Australian Government has provided an indemnity to the manufacturer of smallpox vaccine held by the Australian Government, covering possible adverse events that could result from the use of the vaccine in an emergency situation. Further, under certain conditions, certain indemnities have been provided to particular manufacturers of pandemic and pre pandemic influenza vaccines for the supply or future supply of influenza vaccines (including H1N1 and H5N1).”

  6. Liz says:

    The link to the medical exemption is not working, centrelink have removed it

  7. Soraya says:

    This documentary “Lethal Injection: The Story of Vaccination” is in the public domain and encouraged by the author for copy, reproduction etc. to be passed on as DVD, etc. to as many as possible. GR8 idea so family and friends can watch thoroughly on their TV and really enjoy it instead of only the first minutes in their “smart” phones… I wish I could thank him personally, simply the best and most complete documentary on this topic I have ever seen… a GEM 🙂

    Another GR8 choice for a DVD distribution is the “Vaccine Mandates: Adults Are Next”, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Exposes The Truth” presentation. Again, in the public domain and encouraged by the author for copy, reproduction etc. to be passed on as DVD or any other form to as many as possible:

    Somehow they complement each other. If I had never spent thousands of hours studying, reading and watching about the vaccine betrayal but only watched those two – they together pretty much says it ALL!!!!!! highly recommended 🙂 🙂 🙂

    When times get tough and you think of giving up while facing SO MUCH WIDE SPREAD IGNORANCE AND PREJUDICE, remember:

    DARKNESS CANNOT SURVIVE LIGHTNESS. Be the light wherever you are, wherever you go…

  8. Soraya says:

    “…how to go about stopping them from making vaccinations mandatory.” Simple: GET OUT of the virtual world of facebook,, tweeter, e-mails into REALITY and TALK to everyone around you, SHOW them the evidences, PROVE the frauds, deceptions and every single secretive evil plot to enslave humanity. DARKNESS CANNOT SURVIVE LIGHTNESS.

  9. Audrey says:

    Please don’t stop fighting for the parents who have done their research and oppose mandatory vaccinations.
    An introductory of a vaccine injury compensation scheme is not any form of compensation to the loss of a child or the the loss of a child’s full function and health.
    Please keep this fight going. The masses cannot turn a blind eye forever.

  10. Soraya says:


    Forget about the supposed “pro” vaccines X “pro” choice X “against” vaccines groups – DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, don’t wait for UPDATED INFO FROM NEWSLETTERS or HEROES TO SAVE YOU…

    The “global” legislation to “protect” your health (and the pHARM/POLITICIANS POCKET$) while infringing in your basic human and civil rights are being passed completely out of the radar under the carpet because of the distraction of No Jab, No Preschool to keep you too busy with it while missing the most important thing which is the “National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment Bill 2016” and the “National Injury Insurance Scheme – research it yourself !!!!

    Bellow, what the proXagainst vaccination are missing… the politicians are using families that suffered vaccine injuries to serve their purpose of installing the fraudulent vaccine injury compensation scheme here through the NATIONAL INJURY INSURANCE SCHEME:

    “A no-fault serious vaccine injury compensation scheme
    I am not aware of anyone who is opposed to such a scheme. It has been promoted and supported by health professionals and health advocates for years. On February 29 2016, Senator Richard Di Natale moved a motion in the Australian Senate:

    (a) in the past 20 years, Australia has an excellent record of achievement in the prevention of disease through immunisation;

    (b) in the most recent annual data records (2012), there were 1,897 adverse events following immunisation;

    (c) a no-fault vaccine injury compensation system would provide critical cover for those exceptionally unfortunate instances where a patient experiences an adverse event with a vaccination;

    (d) nineteen other countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States of America and New Zealand, have a no-fault vaccine injury compensation system, and such a scheme would enable Australia to compensate the families where there is this extremely rare instance of long-term vaccine injury;

    (e) high rates of immunisation reflect public trust in its benefits, and such trust would only be strengthened by the knowledge that the community will look after the few unfortunate casualties of a highly successful immunisation program.

    Senator Di Natale’s motion was negatived (opposed and failed); but, not for the reasons anti-vaccination conspiracy theorists would have you think. The Senate is not against such a scheme. The motion was negatived because negotiations for such a scheme are already underway. As outlined by Senator Ryan:

    The government is currently in negotiations with the states and territories on the establishment of a National Injury Insurance Scheme, a federated model of separate state-based no-fault schemes that provide lifetime care and support for people who have sustained a catastrophic injury. This is as recommended by the Productivity Commission in 2011. One stream of work in these negotiations is discussions to provide cover for medical accidents, where issues such as causality and the scope of such cover will be elements of the negotiations.

    Question negatived.

    One thing which makes me sit up and take notice of that reply, however, is the date that the Productivity Commission recommended such a scheme: 2011. This is a year before Ben Hammond’s “probable” vaccine injury, in 2012. Wouldn’t it be nice if some retrospective legislation was eventually put in place, backdated to 2011? It would certainly be nice for the Hammonds.”

  11. Soraya says:

    “2030 Agenda

    The United Nations formally agreed to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (the 2030 Agenda) on 25 September 2015 in New York. The 2030 Agenda is non-binding but has unprecedented buy‑in as a result of consultation and negotiations involving all 193 UN member states, the private sector and civil society.

    The 2030 Agenda is a comprehensive, progressive and innovative agenda that responds to the many challenges faced by the world today and into the future. It includes 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) and 169 targets within those goals. The full list of goals and targets is available at: UN Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform (link is external).

    The 2030 Agenda aims to integrate the social, environmental and economic dimensions of sustainable development. Many of the sustainable development goals are directly environmental in focus or address the sustainability of natural resources. Individual goals focus on health, food and agriculture, water and sanitation, human settlements, energy, climate change, sustainable consumption and production, oceans, and terrestrial ecosystems.

    The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, in partnership with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, leads the Australian Government’s implementation of the 2030 Agenda. The Department of the Environment and Energy is responsible for the domestic implementation of environmental goals and targets. The department is actively examining its policies, programs and reporting systems to determine what changes we might make to better align with, and capitalise on opportunities emerging from, the environmental dimensions of the 2030 Agenda.”


    “Global development
    The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
    The UN’s 193 member states formally agreed to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (the 2030 Agenda) on 25 September 2015 in New York. The new agenda provides a roadmap for global development efforts to 2030 and beyond.

    While non-binding, the 2030 Agenda will be highly influential, shaping development cooperation and finance flows from a range of sources, including nation states, multilateral organisations, the private sector and philanthropic entities.

    Sustainable Development Goals

    The 2030 Agenda succeeds the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) but is a more comprehensive, progressive and innovative agenda that responds to the many challenges faced by the world today and into the future.

    It includes 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) and 169 targets within those goals. The full list of goals and targets is available at: UN Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform

    In addition to building on the MDGs, the SDGs include important new goals on economic growth, infrastructure, peace and effective governance, and oceans.

    The 2030 Agenda helps Australia in advocating for a strong focus on economic growth and development in the Indo-Pacific region, and in promoting investment priorities including gender equality, governance and strengthening tax systems.

    It is also well aligned with Australia’s foreign, security and trade interests especially in promoting regional stability, security and economic prosperity.

    The 2030 Agenda is non-binding but has unprecedented buy‑in as a result of consultation and negotiations involving all 193 UN member states, the private sector and civil society.

    Australia actively participated in international discussions to design the SDGs and supported the involvement of all development actors, including civil society organisations, the private sector, philanthropic organisations and academia.

    International Development Finance
    The third International Financing for Development Conference took place in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 13-16 July 2015. The Conference built on the outcomes of earlier financing conferences in Monterrey (2002) and Doha (2008). The focus was on broadening the range of sources of finance including from developing and emerging economies, the private sector and new philanthropic organisations. Importantly, it also emphasized the importance of building the right enabling environments in developing countries will promote economic growth and attract investment. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda outcome document places a strong emphasis on each country’s responsibility for its own development, the importance of focusing on economic growth, the vital role of the private sector and the ways in which the empowerment of women and girls can drive growth. At the Conference, Australia was proud to join the Addis Tax Initiative (ATI) and committed to doubling our investment in strengthening developing countries’ tax systems from $16 million in 2014-15 to $32 million in 2020.

    Global Development Governance and Effectiveness
    Australia is working to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of development efforts through a range of global programs.

    Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and the Busan Agreement

    In 2011 Governments, NGOs, private sector organisations and other development partners came together to discuss and agree broad principles for effective development cooperation. The Busan Agreement recognised the value that all development partners bring to international development cooperation, and set out broad principles for cooperation: ownership of development priorities by developing countries, a focus on results, inclusive partnerships, transparency and accountability.

    Born out of the Busan Agreement the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) aims to bring together all development partners to: maintain and strengthen political momentum for more effective development co-operation; ensure accountability for implementing Busan commitments; and facilitate knowledge exchange and sharing of lessons learned.

    The Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Hon Julie Bishop MP, attended the First High-Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) in Mexico City, April 2014. This meeting emphasized the importance of the global community working together to ensure development is effective.

    Development Assistance Committee

    The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) is an international forum for donor governments to exchange policy experience and identify good practice. The DAC is internationally recognised for its development statistics, and its peer reviews of members’ development programs are well regarded.

    Australia is playing an active role in DAC processes to modernise Official Development Assistance (ODA) measures, standards and systems. This has included: recent adjustments to the way ODA loans are measured; a commitment in 2014 to target ODA to countries most in need; and, work on a new measure for ‘total official support for development’ to complement the ODA measure.

    Australia also plays an active role in shaping the analytical work of the DAC, including through engagement and support of the DAC Program of Work and Budget as well as work on enhancing peer reviews. Australia is actively engaged in DAC networks, including for gender equality and governance (for which Australia is co-chair). Australia also works with those bodies and programs that align closely with Australia’s development priorities, in particular on conflict and fragility, leveraging other drivers of development such as domestic finance, and development finance statistics.

    High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development

    The High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) is a new UN entity and replaces the former Commission on Sustainable Development. The HLPF is mandated to play a coordinating role in the context of the 2030 Agenda, integrating the human and social development and sustainable development workstreams, reviewing progress against the agreed agenda and providing political leadership on sustainable development.

    Millennium Development Goals
    Australia is one of 189 countries that adopted the Millennium Declaration in 2000, which subsequently led to the formation of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs, which expired at the end of 2015, were a shared vision for reducing poverty; and improving health, gender equality, education and the environment.

    The world has made good progress toward achieving the MDGs. Hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty. In fact the poverty reduction target was met five years ahead of schedule. The target on improving access to safe drinking water has also been met and other targets, including the target on achieving gender parity in primary education, are close to being met.

    However, despite considerable success, several targets were not met, including halving the proportion of people suffering from hunger and addressing maternal and child mortality. In the Indo-Pacific, progress has been mixed and large disparities still exist in overall levels of poverty.

    Like other countries, Australia has taken the lessons learned from the MDGs into the development of the 2030 Agenda.”



    Overseas travel exposes you to wonderful new experiences, but it can also expose you to potentially serious health risks. Biosecurity measures are important to protect Australia’s border.

    Page last updated: 22 June 2016

    Table of Contents

    What is biosecurity?
    Why do health authorities implement biosecurity measures?
    Ill travellers
    What is biosecurity?
    Biosecurity refers to all the measures taken to minimise the risk of infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria or other micro-organisms entering and establishing in Australia, potentially harming the Australian population, our food security and economy.

    Common biosecurity measures are:
    Asking Captains of aircraft and ships to notify the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, (Agriculture Biosecurity) of any ill travellers who are on an aircraft before it lands or a ship before it docks.
    Fact Sheet: Reporting an illness or death – Important quarantine information for crew of international ships and aircraft.
    Agriculture Biosecurity Officers meeting very ill travellers on incoming aircrafts and ships to determine if they are carrying a serious infectious disease. This allows people to be referred for immediate medical attention if they are carrying a particularly serious disease such as Yellow Fever.
    Providing information to travellers about what symptoms to look out for immediately after they return from overseas and how to seek medical attention if they are unwell.
    Why do health authorities implement biosecurity measures?
    When people travel they can develop infections through food, water, insect bites, contact with animals or contact with other people. Often a person does not know they have developed an infectious disease until they become unwell days or weeks later. Symptoms of an infection might only develop, or become serious, after a person has returned to Australia.

    Some of the diseases at which biosecurity measures are directed are rare and/or serious, such as Viral Haemorrhagic Fevers (VHFs) or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Some more familiar diseases are also important because outbreaks can occur if they are introduced by an unwell traveller. Diseases of concern under the Biosecurity Act 2015 include:

    Human influenza with pandemic potential
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
    Middle East respiratory syndrome
    Viral haemorrhagic fevers
    Yellow Fever (in Northern Australia)
    Information about where a person has travelled and whether they are feeling unwell when they arrive in Australia may be required so that public health authorities can provide advice on seeking appropriate medical attention. It also allows people to be informed about how to avoid exposing their family, friends, co-workers or the community to the risk of spreading an infectious disease. All infectious diseases are different, and it is important that travellers who are unwell have access to specialist public health advice as soon as possible.

    The accuracy of information provided by travellers when they return to Australia, and people promptly seeking medical attention if they become unwell in the period immediately after their return to Australia, are both critical in preventing the spread of introduced infectious diseases.

    Ill travellers
    If you show symptoms of an infectious disease while travelling to Australia the Biosecurity Act 2015 requires that the Captain/Master reports this to the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Biosecurity Officers before arrival in Australia. If your illness has been reported an Agriculture, Biosecurity Officer may board your ship or aircraft to assess you and ask you a number of questions. Information on how your personal information will be managed is detailed in the Traveller with Illness Checklist Privacy Notice, which is available below:

    Traveller with Illness Checklist Privacy Notice PDF
    Traveller with Illness Checklist Privacy Notice Word”

  12. Soraya says:

    “Jane Burgermeister – pandemic update 25 June 2012

    Published on Jun 25, 2012
    Jane Bürgermeister’s blog:
    Hundreds of reports have appeared in the mainstream media in the past couple of days hyping the danger of a new bioengineered bird flu virus which is transmissible between humans as the Globalists try to condition humanity to accept a new pandemic emergency and a mass vaccination campaign with a toxic pandemic jab.
    Yet again, the people of the world are facing the monolithic threat of a mass vaccination campaign with a pandemic vaccine now proven beyond a doubt to cause harm.
    In 2011, the danger of a new pandemic emergency declaration was increased when Big Pharma was allowed to get significant control of the WHO pandemic virus warning system.
    In a clear conflict of interest, Big Pharma is now in a perfect position to hype a new virus and also call for speedy vaccinations which the drugs companies also stand to profit the most from.
    In 2009, Baxter created a similar type of deadly bioweapon when it contaminated 72 kilos of the transmissible seasonal flu with the deadly bird flu virus in its biosecurity level 3 facilities in Orth an der Donau and sent it to 16 labs in four countries. A police investigation was halted in September 2009 just before a mass pandemic vaccination campaign with a vaccine now confirmed by the governments of Ireland, Sweden, Finland and Norway to have caused narcolepsy.
    The way Big Pharma used its financial clout to influence WHO to declare a pandemic emergency level 6 in 2009 has been well documented.
    In spite of the scandal, the world is facing the same national pandemic plans. Once more we are facing forced vaccination with the same toxic jab and quarantine.
    The mainstream media and the false flag alternative media led by Alex Jones are once more hyping the new super virus as a killer and downplaying the vaccine danger.
    The new bird flu virus is no killer.
    The whole story:…”

  13. Soraya says:

    “HEADS UP! US GOV thru ‘CDC’ Atlanta owns PATENT on EBOLA Virus since 2007/200706291:

    Published on Oct 20, 2014
    Ebola Patent is owned by: The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health & Human Services, Center For Disease Control. “HUMAN EBOLA VIRUS SPECIES AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS THEREOF, DEPOSIT STATEMENT, Article [0001] The invention provides the isolated human Ebola (hEbola) viruses denoted as Bundibugyo (EboBun) deposited with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”;
    Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America) on November 26, 2007 and accorded an accession number 200706291.” THE CDC,Atlanta Georgia, has PATENT NUMBERS on the “EBOLA VIRUS” since 2007.
    “Owners: The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human Services Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (Apr 15 2011)”
    “Applicants: Towner Jonathan S Nichol Stuart T Comer James A Ksiazek Thomas G Rollin Pierre E,
    Government Of The Us As Represented By The Secretary Of The Dept Of Health.”
    ” US 2012/0251502 A1
    Patent Application, Human Ebola Virus Species And Compositions And Methods Thereof ”
    1) “US 2012/0251502 A1, Patent Application, Human Ebola Virus Species And Compositions And Methods Thereof”
    2) “Human ebola virus species and compositions and methods thereof – CA 2741523 A1”…”



    Published on Sep 3, 2016
    By Gary Olson, Ph.D., a member of the political science department at Moravian College in Bethlehem, PA.

    [Note: The World Health Organization has declared the Zika virus an international public health emergency and some four million people may be infected this year. Zika may cause brain damage and unusually small heads in newborns—called microcephaly. Women who become infected while pregnant are at especially high risk.]

    Uppyurs Pharmaceuticals, the drug manufacturing behemoth, is frantically attempting to vanquish rivals Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and others by producing a Zika vaccine. A copy of the minutes from a recent Uppyurs Executive Board meeting was surreptitiously obtained by the author.

    According to the minutes, “If everything breaks right we will have a Zika vaccine on the market by mid-2018 and we anticipate revenues in the range of $7.5 billion dollars. Proceeding with this is a no-brainer.”


    “Published on Aug 8, 2012
    Our privatised money system explained. Jane Burgermeisters explains why changing our money system — privatized in stealth without people realising it — must be our first priority.
    Alternative link to the video:…”

  14. Soraya says:

    “Romley Stewart – how to find the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA corporation:

    Published on Oct 12, 2015
    Romley Stewart presents step-by-step instructions to guide you through the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (USSEC) website. He asks: is Australia a privately owned for-profit corporation, invaded by stealth, with a US SEC CIK number (Central Index Key) of # 0000805157?

    Update: since filming this video, Tony Abbott has been toppled in a successful leadership challenge on 15 September 2015 by Malcolm Turnbull, who consequently became the 29th Prime Minister of Australia. Neither Malcolm Turnbull or Mike Baird (the current Premier of of New South Wales after the shock resignation of former NSW Premier, Barry O’Farrell) ever received a single vote from the Australian public when attaining their respective leadership roles.”


    “Vaccine Mandates are Just Corporate Statutes

    Published on May 17, 2014
    Most people do not really understand how our government works. When state legislators pass vaccine mandates for school admission, parents believe these mandates are laws. They are not laws, but merely corporate rules.”

    • Vicky says:

      You said it…and thanks <3 But what do we do about it? You seem very knowledgable- I know nothing about laws yet i know these are not LAWS…what they call 'legal' is not LAWFUL. I just need to know- we all should- how to go about stopping them from making vaccinations mandatory. How to win in court cases…something! What an we do please…if you know. I loved what you said.

  15. Soraya says:

    *”A vaccine-injury compensation scheme [SCAM] removes the uncertainty of tort liability for manufacturers and provides a more fair, efficient and stable approach for injured parties[?]. Litigation is an expensive and restricted avenue that is inaccessible for many vaccine recipients. Furthermore, compensation schemes avoid the polarization of drug companies against vaccine recipients through litigation and the associated negative media coverage.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *