What is COVID-19
Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that cause respiratory infections. These can range from the common cold to more serious diseases.
COVID-19 is a disease said to be caused by a new form of coronavirus. It was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan City in China.
History of the virus
On December 31, 2019, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that a mysterious pneumonia was sickening dozens in China. Health authorities in China confirmed that dozens of people were being treated for pneumonia from an unknown source.
On January 11, 2020, Chinese state media reported the first death from novel coronavirus, a 61-year-old man who had visited the live animal market in Wuhan. On January 23, 2020 China imposed strict lockdown in Wuhan.
At the end of January 2020 the WHO declared a global health emergency. On February 11, the WHO announced that the novel coronavirus’ formal new name was COVID-19.
On March 11, 2020, the coronavirus outbreak was labelled a pandemic by the WHO.
A pandemic is a disease that is spreading in multiple countries around the world at the same time.
Read More: Timeline: How coronavirus got started
Symptoms
People with coronavirus may experience symptoms such as fever, coughing, sore throat and shortness of breath. Other symptoms maybe runny nose, headache, muscle or joint pains, nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, loss of sense of smell, altered sense of taste, loss of appetite and fatigue.
How is it spread
The virus can spread from person to person through:
- close contact with an infectious person (including in the 48 hours before they had symptoms)
- contact with droplets from an infected person’s cough or sneeze
- touching objects or surfaces (like doorknobs or tables) that have droplets from an infected person, and then touching your mouth or face.
Prevention
The recommended preventative measures include good hygiene, physical distancing, limits on social gatherings, isolation and masks.
Diagnosis
Polymerase chain reaction testing or PCR testing is the type of test done for COVID-19. A doctor or nurse doing the test will place a swab on a thin stick in the back of your throat and 2-3cm up into your nose.
Treatment
Treatment for the putative novel coronavirus is following the same pattern as for SARS. Apart from standard treatment for respiratory conditions, there is a tendency towards providing oxygen to patients more aggressively (e.g. intubation), the use of high dose corticosteroids (e.g. methylprednisolone) and a variety of antiviral medications.
Then there is the other side to COVID-19
The following information is from researcher and author, the late David Crowe
The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus, a virus that has emerged from wild bats or other animals in China, supported by the western assumption that Chinese people will eat anything that moves. If the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus.
Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.
Virus Existence
Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this:
“we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood”
But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients… confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”
Another paper quietly admitted that: “our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”
Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, can simply be stated as:
• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
• Verify that the same illness is produced.
• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.
Koch’s Postulates
Dr. Tom Cowan M.D. discusses Koch’s postulates: the standard by which scientists and doctors have long determined infectious diseases.
These have not been applied in this case of COVID 19.
In this podcast he explains how we prove there is an infective agent.
If you have a set of symptoms: high fever, rash, stiff neck, and are sicker than you’ve ever been and nothing is done you will die in a few days for example, in the case of meningococcal meningitis.
If you examine the blood of all the people with meningococcus then 100% of them will grow out the bacteria meningococcal in their blood.
No normal people will have this growing in their blood because having this disease in their blood is not compatible with life.
When you take meningococcus and purify it and then you inject it into another person or animal, 100% will get sick and have same symptoms You can do this with a virus as well.
For example people with chicken pox have the same symptoms as each other: 100% of those with chicken pox will have millions of copies of the virus in their blood and in their vesicular fluid.
These millions of viruses can be seen on electron microscope. The culture is then purified and an animal will be exposed and will get the same symptoms.
The RT PCR test
This is a surrogate test and is not intended for identification of viruses. What happens in this test:
A piece of RNA is turned into DNA by the process of reverse transmission.
They postulate if you have evidence of that DNA that means you have infection with that organism
But the problem is that if you haven’t proved that there is infection with the organism in the first place, as Cowan has detailed, you are not able to use this test to demonstrate infection.
They have not proved the virus existence so this testing is not possible.
What does this test show?
It is said that this coronavirus is in the bodies of people who are sick but not all of them. The DNA is amplified through cycles. This copies the original RNA.
There is no way to know how many are false positives. If the amplification is 35 times then it is not enough. Tom Cowan continues:
If the amplification is done 60 times then everyone is positive so you have to find the ‘sweet spot’
In other words amplification at 37 times you start to find it. 40 cycles is too many.
lets say you do the test and set the number of cycles:
a low number of false positives at 39 cycles of 1% means that if you test 30 million people you will get 300,000 who will be positive and then you have an epidemic
The test is totally manipulated.
Further links to information regarding the flawed test kits.
COVID-19 tests FauciDr Rashid A Buttar WHY EVERYONE COULD TEST POSITIVE
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
Maker Kary Mullis over PCR tests
The ramifications of this manipulation is there for all of us to see and experience as we live in our shutdown world. Media hysteria, social distancing, people donned with masks and gloves. Governments spending millions on hospital protective gear and ventilators that so far in Australia are idle.
COVID survival rates
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) released an update to their research on the fatality rate associated with COVID-19. This update, dated September 10, 2020, is based on data received by the CDC through August 8, 2020.
A quick summary of COVID-19 survival rates is shown below. The summary is based on the CDC table provided at the end of this report.
CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates
Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%
David Crowe sums up the coronavirus panic:
The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified.
There is a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs. And, given enough time there will be a vaccine developed and, for some of the traumatized countries, it may become mandatory, even if developed after the epidemic has disappeared, so that proving that it reduces the risk of developing a positive test will be impossible.
COVID vaccines
There are currently more than 100 COVID-19 vaccine candidates under development and Australia has entered into 4 separate agreements for the supply of COVID-19 vaccines.
Vaccines do not consist of a bit of virus and some salty water. Vaccines usually take many years to come to fruition so the announcement that Australians might have access to this vaccine by early next year is crazy. Even so the race is on in earnest.
In 2011 the US supreme court ruled vaccines “unavoidably unsafe”. The National Vaccine injury compensation program has paid out over $4.1 BILLION for vaccine injuries and deaths since 1989.
In August 2020, the Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced that Australia had signed a deal with pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca to produce a potential vaccine being developed by Oxford University.
Explaining how the vaccine works, study lead author Professor Andrew Pollard, University of Oxford, UK, says: “The new vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus viral vector (ChAdOx1) vaccine that expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. It uses a common cold virus (adenovirus) that infects chimpanzees, which has been weakened so that it can’t cause any disease in humans, and is genetically modified to code for the spike protein of the human SARS-CoV-2 virus. This means that when the adenovirus enters vaccinated people’s cells it also delivers the spike protein genetic code. This causes these people’s cells to produce the spike protein, and helps teach the immune system to recognise the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
The volunteers of the phase 3 trials were given either the experimental COVID-19 vaccine or the meningococcal conjugate vaccine. The control group was not given an inert placebo such as normal saline but were given the meningococcal vaccine arguably one of the most dangerous vaccines. No vaccine in use has ever been compared to a saline placebo so none of those on the vaccine schedule can be considered safe. Therefore comparing this vaccine to the meningococcal vaccine makes no sense at all unless you are a vaccine manufacturer.
Just a couple of weeks after PM Morrison’s vaccine announcement in August, AstraZeneca ordered a halt to their phase 3 trials due to a severe adverse event — reportedly involving inflammation of the spinal cord — suffered by one of the trial participants. The media announced that the condition was transverse myelitis.
Transverse myelitis is a rare clinical syndrome in which an immune-mediated process causes neural injury to the spinal cord. The pathogenesis of transverse myelitis is mostly of an autoimmune nature, triggered by various environmental factors, including vaccination. Transverse myelitis has been associated with different vaccines including those against hepatitis B virus, measles—mumps—rubella, diphtheria—tetanus—pertussis and others, given to infants, children and adults.
This vaccine trial should be stopped for good. This promises to be one of the worst vaccines ever.
And this is not the only problem with the Oxford vaccine. According to an article in WIRED
‘After the first clinical trial for this vaccine began in April, for example, the researchers added new study arms in which people got acetaminophen every six hours for 24 hours after the injection.. Newspapers only said the vaccine had been proven “safe with rhesus monkeys,” and did not cause any adverse effects in those animal tests.
More from WIRED
How rough a ride were people having with this vaccine? Was the acetaminophen meant to keep down fever, headaches, malaise—or all of the above?
It is important to understand that volunteers in vaccine trials are chosen from healthy people. If the Oxford vaccine is necessitating six hourly acetaminophen (panadol) and causing paralysis in fit people what will happen when it is rolled out to the general population so many of whom suffer chronic health.
Even worse is the news that this is the second time that administration of the vaccine has been paused in the UK, according to two people who took part in the study and to information sheets uploaded to a clinical trial registry. And it is the second case of transverse myelitis.
This is concerning, even more so when… Six days after this abrupt and startling halt of their late-stage study of the Oxford vaccine for Covid-19, AstraZeneca was back in business.
On November 9, 2020, biotech company CSL began producing 30 million doses of the Oxford vaccine ahead of time so it can be released immediately, if trials prove successful.
A world economic shutdown and a draconian curtailing of civil liberties along with mandatory vaccination is an unacceptable price to pay for a virus that has not been purified and proven to be the cause of recent deaths worldwide.
Some talking points: COVID-19 vaccines
HAVE A MINOR IMPACT: Vaccine manufacturers claim that Covid-19 vaccines are 95 percent “effective,” but the FDA is allowing companies to define effectiveness as “prevention of mild symptoms.” The studies are not designed to detect a reduction in outcomes such as severe illness, hospitalization or death.
EXPECT ADVERSE REACTIONS: Participants in every Covid-19 vaccine trial have reported adverse reactions including high fever, chills, muscle pains and headaches. According to the FDA, potential long-term effects may include Guillain-Barré syndrome, brain swelling, muscle weakness and paralysis, convulsions and seizures, stroke, narcolepsy, shock, heart attack, autoimmune disease, arthritis and joint pain, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and death. Some UK health workers have experienced anaphylactic shock after receiving one dose of the approved vaccine.
WON’T PREVENT COVID-19: An FDA Pfizer briefing paper published December 10, 2020 revealed 43 percent more suspected cases of Covid-19 in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group within seven days of vaccination.
NO LIABILITY: Manufacturers will have complete indemnity, freedom from liability, even though all previous attempts at creating coronavirus vaccines caused harm and never advanced to regulatory approval.
WILL NOT END RESTRICTIVE MEASURES: Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health acknowledges that the vaccines may prevent symptoms but will not block spread of the virus, so vaccine recipients will still need to wear masks, practice social distancing and avoid crowds.
IS NOT NECESSARY: According to the CDC’s current best estimate, the “infection fatality rate” (IFR) for Covid-19 is less than 1 percent for people age 69 and younger, including a .003 percent IFR for children and adolescents.
COULD MAKE YOU STERILE: Two prominent doctors, including the ex-head of Pfizer’s respiratory research, warn that Covid-19 vaccines contain a spike protein called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of the placenta. If the vaccine triggers an immune response to this protein, then female infertility, miscarriage or birth defects could result.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: www.westonaprice.org/coronavirus/
Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine approved for use in Australia
On February 25, 2021, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced that The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) had provisionally approved the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for use in Australia.
The TGA provisional approval is for individuals 16 years of age and older. Two doses will be required – at least 21 days apart.
A priority group of Australians are expected to now receive their first dose of the vaccine as soon as it can be received from Pfizer and the necessary checks are undertaken by the TGA, prior to its distribution.
It is expected that vaccination will begin in late February.
This is a link to a new page where you can find templates of letters to give to employers who insist on COVID-19 and Influenza jabs.
Links to sites and articles well worth reading and watching:
A presentation made by a retired medical doctor with 30 years experience as a medical practitioner.
The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years
Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release
Pfizer Documents Released!
The Pfizer documents that were to be sealed for decades released!
See: 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Starting on page 30 of the document, you will find 9 pages of adverse events from the vaccine.