The newly formed Australian Centre for Disease Control has released a consultation paper “Towards a National Immunisation Strategy for 2025-2030”.
The paper gives an overview of where vaccination policy is headed in the next five years. In a nutshell it will be more of the coercive and manipulative tactics that we have witnessed over the last three years. The strategy is all about increasing acceptance of vaccination. Informed consent isn’t mentioned.
There is an accompanying survey to this paper which we encourage everyone to fill out. https://consultations.health.gov.au/ohp-immunisation-branch/discussion-paper-towards-the-national-immunisation/consultation/intro/
While we find the survey to be badly designed and very biased, we think it’s important to have your say whenever possible. The survey does allow for some commentary, so please provide your feedback to the government.
The survey doesn’t allow for long form answers or for attaching documents so it is necessary to be concise with comments.
You can find the AVN’s full response at this link. (PDF)
Here is an excerpt of the AVN’s responses.
(Optional): Please provide further comments about your response, including any suggested amendments to the Vision.:
There is no such thing as vaccine preventable diseases. Vaccines are toxic, contaminated and ineffective. Change the vision to promotion of informed consent and randomized studies with a true placebo. No coercive vaccination policies permitted.
(Optional): Please provide further comments about your response, including any suggested amendments to the Mission.:
This mission is purely to increase vaccination uptake. What needs action is the rampant rates of vaccine injury in Australia. All coercive policies including. No Jab No Pay/No Play need to be rescinded immediately. All workplace vaccination mandates of any kind need to be removed.
(Optional): Are there any other priority areas you think should be included in the Framework?
Informed consent must be the main focus. There must not be vaccination rate targets. If citizens are informed and choose to not partake in the program that is their right and their decision must be respected. Anything less is a complete infringement on human rights.
Optional, if there any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to improve immunisation coverage? If yes, please note them. :
Instead of trying to manipulate people into getting vaccines they don’t want the focus should be on informed consent and respecting the right to bodily autonomy.
If YES, please provide a brief reason. Are there particular groups of people and/or vaccines that you consider it important to have evidence-informed targets? Please list them and provide a brief rationale.:
No. Vaccine targets cannot coexist with informed consent. If everyone chooses not to vaccinate that must be respected.
Optional, if there are any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to strengthen engagement, awareness and understanding of immunisation? If yes, please note them.:
Undertake true safety studies of all vaccines (which is not currently done). Do not propagandize citizens and coerce them into taking vaccinations. Ensure informed consent procedures are followed.
Optional, If there are any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to strengthen program governance? If yes, please note them.:
Health should be the focus, but it isn’t mentioned in this report. Vaccination and good health are mutually exclusive. This strategy should be renamed the Vaccination Strategy. Vaccination and immunisation are not the same thing.
Optional, if there are any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to leverage immunisation data? If yes, please note them.:
Australia doesn’t have a robust vaccine safety system. If it did the covid vaccines would have been removed from circulation within months of their launch. Vaccine injury is rarely reported and even more rarely acknowledged by the system.
Optional, if there are any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to strengthen the immunisation workforce? If yes, please note them.:
It is reprehensible that the government uses cultural diversity to more heavily coerce and manipulate vulnerable populations into receiving untested, dangerous vaccinations.
Optional, if there any other opportunities for action that you think the Strategy should focus on to prepare for emergencies? If yes, please note them.:
The strategy should focus only on informed consent and ensuring that genuine and long- term safety studies are completed. There should be a robust vaccine injury reporting system put in place. History shows that a vaccine injury compensation scheme is only there to give a false sense of security to the public. These schemes generally have very small amounts of compensation available, the process to be compensated is almost impossible to navigate, and there is a very limited list of accepted injuries. The government has lost the faith of the public over the complete mishandling of the covid situation and the lies and false assurances that were given in regards to the untested, novel injections that were foisted onto the public. Censorship and mandates are now the only tools the government has to manipulate the public into vaccination compliance.
(Optional) Please provide any additional feedback on the Strategy not captured in your previous responses.:
All of the answer options provided are designed to be in support of the vaccination strategy. In light of the covid vaccination debacle it shows a complete lack of insight by the authorities into the trust that they have lost regarding vaccination. It is disingenuous to design such a one- eyed survey that doesn’t allow for true disagreement with the strategy. This survey has been designed to provide the answers that the government wants, which is complete support of any and all coercive and manipulative vaccination policies. The number of vaccine injury victims is growing by the day. For the ACDC to completely disregard this fact in pushing for vaccination targets is disgusting and inhumane. This strategy needs to be completely abandoned and replaced with a plan for promoting informed consent. In a free society that respects human rights there must never be vaccination targets. People must be free to make their own health decisions, regardless of how the government and pharmaceutical companies feel about those decisions. Truth will prevail.