|
For some time now, members of the government and the medical industry
have tried to explain away the phenomenon of parental refusal to
vaccinate. Despite the government’s own studies, such as Rogers and
Pilgrim; 1993, which shows that “Older, highly educated parents form
the basis of the [sic] anti-immunisation lobby”, parents continue to be
accused of being ignorant, uncaring and stupid for refusing vaccines
which the medical community claim will keep their children healthy.
For some time now, members of the government and the medical industry
have tried to explain away the phenomenon of parental refusal to
vaccinate. Despite the government’s own studies, such as Rogers and
Pilgrim; 1993, which shows that “Older, highly educated parents form
the basis of the [sic] anti-immunisation lobby”, parents continue to be
accused of being ignorant, uncaring and stupid for refusing vaccines
which the medical community claim will keep their children healthy.
In
an effort to set the record straight, the AVN, which is contacted by
more than 10,000 Australian parents each year who question this
procedure, would like to give you the 10 most common reasons why the
parents who contact us have chosen not to vaccinate.
1 - Vaccines have never been tested.
The
gold standard of medical science is the double blind crossover placebo
study. This test has never been performed on any vaccine currently
licensed in Australia. In an astounding leap of logic, contrary to all
rules of science, vaccines are assumed to be safe and effective and
therefore, it is considered to be unethical to withhold vaccinations
for the purposes of testing them.
2 - Vaccines contain toxic additives and heavy metals.
The
list of vaccine ingredients includes toxins such as formaldehyde, a
substance which the Queensland Poisons Control Centre has said was
“unsafe at any level if injected into the human body”; carbolic acid,
also a strong poison which was implicated in deaths and serious
injuries in a recent Sydney hospital mishap; aluminium which is linked
with the development of Alzheimer’s disease and allergies; and
Thiomersal, a mercury-based preservative which is a known neurotoxin
and whose inclusion in vaccination sparked a series of Congressional
hearings which saw the US Government and the AAP (American Academy of
Paediatrics) call for its immediate withdrawal from any vaccine product
and which was withdrawn over two years ago in the USA from any
over-the-counter medicines . It was also withdrawn from the American
Hepatatis B vaccines, Engerix and HB Vax II, though their Australian
counterparts which are still being injected into children here today,
are only just being made mercury free or mercury reduced (though the
old, mercury-laced stocks will be used up rather than being withdrawn
from use).
3 - Vaccines are contaminated with human and animal viruses and bacteria
All
childhood vaccines, apart from the Hepatitis B (which is genetically
engineered and carries with it a different set of problems,) are
cultured on either animal tissue, a broth of animal and/or human blood
and blood products or the cell lines from aborted human foetuses. None
of these culturing methods is able to guarantee an uncontaminated
vaccine. In fact, it is well known that many foreign viruses and
bacteria can and do contaminate vaccines. Almost none of these
contaminants have been studied. The few which have been leave many
parents concerned about the long-term effects of injecting these
substances into their children. For instance, SV 40 (simian or monkey
virus 40 – just one of 60 monkey viruses known to contaminate the polio
vaccines) has been linked with cancers in humans; there is a chicken
retrovirus which contaminates the measles and mumps vaccines called
Reverse Transcriptase. This substance, an ancient non-human DNA code,
is thought to switch on the HIV virus and cause it to become AIDS in
humans; AIDS itself has been linked with a virus called SIV (Simian
Immunodeficiency Virus) which contaminated both the polio and smallpox
vaccines; the current MMR (measles mumps rubella) and other vaccines
which contain bovine (cow) blood products are thought to be able to
spread the human and always fatal form of mad cow disease,
Creutzfeld-Jacobs disease, more readily than eating contaminated meat.
4 - Vaccines can cause serious immediate side effects.
As
long as there have been vaccines, there have been reports of serious
side effects following their administration. These side effects include
(but are not limited to) convulsions and epilepsy, permanent brain
damage, anaphylactic (life threatening allergic) reactions, Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), retinal and brain haemorrhages (now being
confused with Shaken Baby Syndrome) and death.
5 - Vaccines can cause serious long-term side effects.
According
to medical reports, children are now less healthy than they have ever
been before. More than 40% of all children now suffer from chronic
conditions , something that was unheard of prior to mass vaccination.
Vaccines have been associated with such conditions as Asthma, Eczema,
Food Allergies, Chronic Ear Infections, Insulin Dependent Diabetes,
Arthritis, Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis, Autism, Attention Deficit
Disorder, Ulcerative Colitis, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Hyperactivity,
Schizophrenia, Multiple Sclerosis, Cancer and a raft of other chronic
and auto-immune conditions which are experiencing dramatic rises in
incidence.
6 - Vaccines do not necessarily protect against infectious diseases.
For
many years, parents were told that once a child was fully vaccinated,
they would be protected for life. That has now turned into a series of
life-long boosters that are still not able to protect either children
or adults from infectious diseases. For the very real risk of both
short and long-term side effects from vaccines, parents are asked to
allow their children to be given vaccines that at best, will provide a
temporary sensitisation to illnesses and at worst, can make their
children more susceptible to both opportunistic and infectious illness.
As evidenced by the recent whooping cough outbreak in SA, the only
Australian state which actually records vaccination status in cases of
infectious illness, 87% of all those who contracted whooping cough and
whose vaccination status was known were fully and appropriately
vaccinated. In fact, Australian government statistics have shown that
the majority of outbreaks in Australia occur in those who have been
either fully vaccinated or were too young to be fully vaccinated.
7
- Doctors, as paid salesmen for vaccine products, are no longer
considered to be trustworthy arbiters of their safety and effectiveness.
Doctors
are currently receiving several payments from the government to push
vaccines. These include $6 for reporting vaccinations to the Australian
Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR), a national database which
tracks vaccination status in our children and which has been called “a
back-door Australia Card”; $18.50 on top of their Medicare rebate for
vaccinating a child on time; and a bulk payment at the end of each year
based upon them having a practice vaccination rate in excess of 80%.
These payments can add up to many tens of thousands of dollars in a
busy inner-city practice.
As a result of this grossly unethical
situation, doctors can no longer be thought of as objective when it
comes to this issue. Parents no longer trust that their doctors will
recommend that they vaccinate simply because it is the best thing for
their child rather than the best thing for the doctor’s bottom line.
8 - Pharmaceutical companies have paid for almost all vaccine research to date.
Just
as the tobacco companies paid for corrupt and incorrect research which
purported to show that tobacco and tobacco products were safe for human
consumption, so too the pharmaceutical companies have paid for and
produced almost all of the research into vaccines. While the Australian
government continues to spend literally hundreds of millions of dollars
a year in promoting and implementing vaccination campaigns (an example
is the $292 million earmarked for vaccination against Meningococcal
this year alone!) and little or no money on independent research,
parents will continue to mistrust the research that has been performed
by vested interests. After all, companies are by their very definition
commercial concerns which are motivated by profit. There is nothing
that would make a pharmaceutical company intrinsically more ethical and
therefore more trustworthy than a tobacco company.
In addition, it
is a little-known fact that the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA),
the government body which licenses and registers vaccines and other
medical products, does not perform any tests whatsoever to verify
pharmaceutical company claims of safety or effectiveness.
9 - Doctors and health professionals rarely if ever report vaccine reactions.
In
discussions with representatives of both ADRAC (The Adverse Drug
Reactions Advisory Committee) and the SAEFVSS (Serious Adverse Events
Following Vaccination Surveillance Scheme), the two government bodies
charged with keeping track of reactions to vaccines and other drugs,
the AVN’s representatives were informed that less than 10% of all
adverse reactions are ever reported. This means that the government’s
claims of vaccine safety are admittedly 90% incorrect. In addition, the
AVN’s adverse reactions database currently contains details on more
than 800 serious adverse vaccine reactions. Not one of these reactions
was ever reported by the doctors or health professionals involved.
Parents cannot rely on data with that wide a margin of error when they
are dealing with the health and well-being of their children.&
10
- Some childhood illnesses have beneficial aspects and therefore,
prevention may not necessarily be in the best interests of the child.
Measles,
for example, has been used in Scandinavian countries to successfully
treat such autoimmune conditions as eczema and many studies have
performed which show that children who do not contract measles
naturally as a child are more likely to suffer from certain cancers
later in life. In addition, recent studies have shown that contracting
the common childhood illnesses help to prime and strengthen the immune
system in a way that vaccinations just cannot do. This priming means
that children are much less likely to suffer from the now common
allergic and autoimmune conditions that plague them today. Conditions
such as asthma, diabetes and cancer. In addition, vaccinated mothers
cannot confer passive immunity to their children even if they have
contracted the wild form of the disease. This immunity used to protect
all children during their vulnerable first months and years. Now, a
vaccinated mother will give birth to a child who will be susceptible to
these infections when, prior to vaccines, they would normally have been
immune.
Vaccination is a
medical procedure. It should never, ever be mandated. Nor should there
ever be any coercion, financial or social penalties for those parents
who have chosen, as is their right under the law, not to take the above
risks on behalf of their children.
Unvaccinated children continue
to be among the healthiest children in our society. They are no more
the carriers of disease than any other healthy person. It is the
government’s responsibility to do the necessary research to ensure that
procedures they are recommending for all Australian families are as
safe and effective as they possibly can be. It is also their
responsibility to keep vested interests honest. On both counts, this
government has failed in its duty of care to our most vulnerable
resource – our children.
Every one of the points raised above
deserves critical examination and public discussion and the parents who
ask these questions deserve respect, not vilification.
References:
- -
C. Wilson; Chronic Exposure and Human Health (1993), McFarland &
Company taken from Our Toxic Times Feb 1997 pgs 18 & 19
- New Scientist, 2/11/96 "Dirty Secrets"
- Aluminium
phosphate but not calcium phosphate stimulates the specific IgE
response in guinea pigs to tetanus toxoid.; Allergy 1978 Jun;33(3):155-9
- Studies
on the toxicities of aluminium hydroxide and calcium phosphate as
immunological adjuvants for vaccines.; Vaccine 1993;11(9):914-8
- Staying
Below the Limit-Manufacturers to Remove Mercury Used in Vaccines; By
Lauran Neergaard; The Associated Press; July 8, 1999.
- Federal Register: April 22, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 77)
- Hepatitis
B Immunization Linked to Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Two abstracts
being presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American College of
Rheumatology (held November 8-12, 1998, in San Diego, California)
- First
central nervous system demyelination and hepatitis B vaccination: a
pilot case control study; REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE (Paris) 2000;156(3):242-246
- Simian virus-40 linked to human giant cell tumors; Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;28:23-30.
- SV-40 and Polio Vaccine; http://www.ccid.org/ASV40.html
- Washington Post ; December 9, 1995; Unexpected Protein Found in Measles-Mumps Vaccine
- Aids: the big mistake?; May 28, 2000, The Sunday Times
- Children ‘face BSE risk from infected jabs’ Daily Express March 30, 2000
- Vaccines
not containing human albumin and vaccines to avoid the risk of
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, European Journal of Pediatrics; Volume 159
Issue 3 (2000) pp 222-222
- Vaccine Information
Statement (VIS)
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/default.htm “As with
every medicine, vaccines carry a small risk of serious harm, such as
severe allergic reaction or even death. Seizure (jerking or
staring)------------6 of every 10,000 doses (or 1 in 333 fully
vaccinated children)”
- Pediatrics 1997
Nov;100(5):767-71 MMR2 immunization at 4 to 5 years and 10 to 12 years
of age: a comparison of adverse clinical events after immunization in
the Vaccine Safety Datalink project. The Vaccine Safety Datalink Team.
- Immunological aspects of demyelinating diseases. [Review] [171 refs] Annual Review of Immunology. 10:153-87, 1992.
- J
Okla State Med Assoc 1996 Apr;89(4):135-8; Perverse reactions to
pertussis vaccine by government medical agencies; Sepkowitz S
- Journal
of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1999 Feb;103(2 Pt 1):321-5; A
clinical analysis of gelatin allergy and determination of its causal
relationship to the previous administration of gelatin-containing
acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus
toxoids.; Nakayama T, Aizawa C, Kuno-Sakai H
- Baraff,
LJ, Ablon, WJ, Weiss, RC; Possible temporal association between
diphtheria-tetanus toxoid pertussis vaccination and sudden infant death
syndrome; Pediatric Infections Diseases; Jan-Feb 1983; 2 (1) 7-11.
- Characteristics
of DPT Postvaccinal Deaths and DPT-caused Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
(SIDS): A Review William C. Torch, Reno, NV, Neurology 36 (Suppl 1)
April 1986
- Give us this day our daily germs; Graham A.W. RookA and John L. Stanford; Immunology Today 1998, 19:113-116
- Lancet, June 29, 1996
|